![]() ![]() Some suggest that “objective reasonableness” is not good enough. Police executives, agencies and associations have weighed in on all sides of the issue. ![]() Some have taken aim at the Graham decision, calling it too broad or not enough, saying it “ gives police a free pass” and fails to “ answer adequately the most basic questions about police uses of force.” One civil rights attorney argued that recent court decisions are “not a path towards justice but rather a series of obstacles to holding police accountable for civil rights violations.” In some places, legislators have proposed laws that would change the Graham standard. There has been an increase in scrutiny of police use of force in recent years. Connor standard into light, with some questioning whether police should be held to a different standard. Specific police use of force cases have brought the Graham v. What these attorneys fail to mention is that many of their own professional decisions are judged under this exact same “objective reasonableness” standard. In the years since, some people, including many criminal defense attorneys, have suggested that officers should be held to a different standard. Connor and established that claims of excessive force by law enforcement officers should be judged under an “objective reasonableness” standard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |